Sora set the industry benchmark, then shut down entirely — here's how the two survivors stack up today.
At a glance: Sora set the industry benchmark and then shut down entirely; of the two survivors, Runway wins on creative control tools and Veo wins on native audio, resolution, and price. Read the methodology note
Set the importance of each factor from 0 to 100. Every metric is normalized, weighted, and summed — the ranking updates instantly as you drag.
Rows where all tools are essentially tied are muted by default — flip the toggle to reveal them.
| Specification | Sora |
Runway |
Veo |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≠Current availability | Discontinued — shutting down entirely | Active, actively developed | ●Active, actively developed |
| ≠Monthly price | N/A — discontinued | $28 (Pro) | $19.99 (via Gemini Advanced) |
| ≠Native audio generation | No (historical) | Not available | Yes — dialogue + SFX, single pass |
| ≠Max output resolution | 1080p (historical) | 4K (Pro) | True 4K, not upscaled |
| ≠Native vertical (9:16) support | Not confirmed (historical) | Limited | Yes, native |
| ≠Base clip length | ●Up to 1 minute (historical) | Up to 16 seconds (HD) | 8 seconds (chainable via Extend) |
| ≠Free tier | N/A — discontinued | 125 one-time credits | 10 clips/mo via Google Vids |
| ≠Creative control tools | Storyboard sequencing (historical) | ●Motion Brush, Director Mode, Act-One | Standard prompting, less granular control |
Each card's bars are that tool's own strengths, on its own terms.
Discontinued — the model that set the industry benchmark, then couldn't make the economics work.
The most precise creative-control tool of the three still operating — built for working professionals.
The only major model generating synchronized dialogue and sound effects in the same pass as the video.
Past the spec sheet: where each one genuinely wins, where it genuinely loses, who should skip it entirely.
Skipping the multi-way math — here is the direct call for each pair.
Creative control vs. completeness — Runway gives filmmakers precise directorial tools; Veo delivers a finished clip with audio in one pass, natively vertical.
Sora set the benchmark Runway and every other competitor chased — but Sora is shutting down and Runway is a living, actively developed platform.
Click a card to load a matching weight profile into the decision engine above.
This is the stuff Reddit threads are actually complaining about — not the headline specs.
Web and app access ended April 26, 2026; API access ends September 24, 2026, with all account data permanently deleted after.
The free and Gemini Advanced tiers work, but full Veo 3.1 Standard quality with audio is gated to the pricier $249.99/mo AI Ultra tier or $0.75/sec via API.
No native audio synthesis at all means every Runway clip needs a separate sound pass — worth planning for in a production pipeline.
The same questions answered in the structured data above, laid out so you can actually read them.
Discontinued — the model that set the industry benchmark, then couldn't make the economics work.
The most precise creative-control tool of the three still operating — built for working professionals.
The only major model generating synchronized dialogue and sound effects in the same pass as the video.
Still unsure? The decision engine at the top does the math for you.
A read of real Sora vs. Veo threads — not a generic AI summary.
Reddit gives Sora the edge on raw realism and prompt-following, but r/SoraAi has been openly nervous since reports surfaced that OpenAI is winding Sora down, while Veo keeps its reputation as the one that "just works" — and Runway survives the fight entirely differently, as the tool editors reach for when they need control, not just a raw clip.
“Sora 2 creates more realistic videos and its not even close.”
“Sora two is quite impressive but veo3's Google flow just works so well.”
“Honestly with how many restrictions and horrible performance the app suddenly got, the writing was on the wall.”
“Sora's video generation is too unreliable and relies heavily on luck.”
“Runway surviving on tooling makes sense, editors don't just want good output they want control.”