Xournal++

What should replace Adobe Acrobat.

2 alternatives, scored against license openness, pricing transparency and migration friction. Toggle the filters to narrow by what matters to you.

FROM

Adobe Acrobat Acrobat Pro $19.99/mo. Reader free but pushes Pro upgrades aggressively.

$0 — $23 / mo

Free

8.0/ 10

PDF Management alternatives are worth considering when the incumbent gets expensive, restrictive, or invasive. Xournal++ (/ˌzɚnl̟ˌ…

Cross-platform

Pricing See site

Read review ↓

Open source

Okular

8.0/ 10

PDF Management alternatives are worth considering when the incumbent gets expensive, restrictive, or invasive. Okular is a FLOSS P…

Open source Cross-platform

Pricing Open-source

Compare →

Showing 2 of 2 · no filters active

Feature	Xournal++	Okular
Free tier	✗	✓
Open source	✗	✓
Privacy posture	✗	✗
Easy migration	•••	•••
Mac / Linux	✓	✓

PDF Management alternatives are worth considering when the incumbent gets expensive, restrictive, or invasive.

Xournal++ (/ˌzɚnl̟ˌplʌsˈplʌs/) is a FLOSS note-taking software for PDF documents. It is a modern rewrite of [Xournal](https://sourceforge.net/projects/xournal/) which is extremely featureful.

Why consider the swap

If you currently rely on Adobe Acrobat and want more control over data, lower long-term costs, or a privacy-friendly licensing model, Xournal++ covers most of the same ground.

What you trade off

Most privacy-friendly alternatives require more setup than their commercial counterparts and may lag on polish, mobile apps, or ecosystem integrations. Check the project’s documentation for current feature parity with Adobe Acrobat before committing.

Where to start

Project page: Xournal++
Comparison reference: Adobe Acrobat

This recommendation is indexed from switching.software. Read their full project notes for the latest changes.

Why consider leaving Adobe Acrobat.

Most people switch for one of three reasons: pricing changed, the original tool added telemetry or AI features they did not want, or a leaner alternative does the one job they actually need better. We score the four candidates against those criteria, not against marketing pages.

Is the top pick really enough.

For ~80% of use cases, yes. The remaining 20% involves edge cases — niche file formats, legacy plug-ins, or institutional dependencies — where you may need to either keep the incumbent or layer a second tool. The migration steps below cover the common gotchas.

Is the cheaper option also less safe.

Not necessarily. Free does not mean abandoned. Tools like Microsoft Defender, Signal and Bitwarden all sit on top of major engineering teams; their free tier is not a loss-leader but a deliberate design choice. Read the funding model in our review to gauge sustainability.

Can I run both side-by-side.

For most categories yes — running two browsers, two notes apps, two photo editors is fine. Antivirus is a known exception (two real-time engines fight). For most workflow tools, dual-running during a 1-2 week migration window is the safest way to switch.

PIXLRUN.COM · DECISION ENGINE V1.0 Last reviewed 2026-05-09 · Methodology

What should replace Adobe Acrobat.

Xournal++

Okular

Side-by-side

Deep dive — Xournal++

Why consider the swap

What you trade off

Where to start

Common questions